| Published in Maintenance
Solutions (October 1999) Maximizing a 'Hidden" Asset Is your roof out of sight and out of mind? Here's a strategy for changing that mentality By Curtis L. Liscum The goal of any roof management plan is relatively straightforward. Maintenance and engineering managers regularly inspect and repair roof system components in order to keep leaks and damage to a minimum and squeeze the most from their organization's roofing dollar. So why is roof management so difficult to implement and, once started, so difficult to sustain? It appears that the adage "out of sight, out of mind" holds particularly true for roofing systems, perhaps even more than for other hidden building assets. While the process of roof management is a constant issue, the task becomes especially crucial when an organization is considering whether or not the time has come to replace an existing roof. Starting the program A few important items to look for in determining if a roof is well-designed and installed is that the roof is appropriate for the anticipated environmental, traffic, and occupancy conditions and has positive drainage. It is also important that the roof meets all applicable codes and insurance requirements, and is installed by a reputable, qualified and experienced roofing contractor using established quality assurance criteria. Keeping accurate documentation of roof design and, more importantly, installation can be instrumental in determining the required corrective action for a noted deficiency. Some of the documentation to obtain and keep in the files:
Taking the next step Roof surveys should be performed by a competent person at least twice a year - in the spring and fall. During the spring survey, the roof should be observed for winter damage so that any required corrective action can be accomplished during favorable summer weather. Fall surveys allow inspectors to identify and make corrections before the onset of winter weather. Managers should conduct additional surveys after storms and major construction activities. A typical roof survey should include:
Survey documentation should include a written report of the roof condition, photographic documentation of specific deficiencies observed and a roof plan that indicates the remedial action required. Several checklists are available to document roof surveys. Be aware, however, that checklists may fall short of conveying accurate condition assessment over the long term. Once is not enough First, perform comprehensive visual surveys semi-annually. For large roofs that are in good condition and have limited rooftop traffic, schedule a comprehensive survey in the spring and a limited overview survey in the fall. Next, conduct a roof survey before the expiration of the manufacturer's or contractor's warranty. This approach allows repair or any warranty-covered deficiency before the expiration of possible monetary obligation. After the survey prior to the expiration of the warranty has been conducted, perform monthly housekeeping surveys on most roof sections. These surveys identify potential problems, such as plugged drains or debris on the roof that may become windborne and cause damage. The frequency of the housekeeping surveys may have to increase during certain periods of the year, such as fall, when leaves and vegetation may plug drains. Finally, conduct roof moisture surveys in three-year cycles unless specific conditions exist that warrant more frequent testing or if you suspect moisture within the roof system. Perform the baseline survey before the contractor's warranty expires so that any required repairs are covered under the terms of the warranty. In any case, the first roof moisture survey should be performed within the first two to three years after installation of the roof. Performing the repairs Also, annual roof repair and maintenance should reduce leakage, associated downtime and resulting interior damage. In-house personnel, roofing contractors or some combination of the two can perform repair and maintenance work, depending on the quality and type of action required and technical abilities of in-house personnel. Generally, minor repairs and housekeeping duties can be done by in-house personnel. Minor repairs can normally be accomplished using industry standard procedures. This approach eliminates the need for lengthy repair specifications. Managers should develop a detailed repair specification if repairs are major or if they are required on several roof sections. Detailed specifications can aid in obtaining competitive bids for performance of the repairs. One note of caution: Make sure an authorized contractor performs any repairs to a roof covered by an active manufacturer's warranty so as not to void the warranty. Staffing Whether the surveys are performed by in-house staff or contracted to an outside consultant depends on the technical ability of in-house personnel. In-house personnel who have had training in roof inspection, diagnosis and repair could perform limited overview surveys, such as those done in the fall of the year. Housekeeping surveys could be assigned to mechanics who are responsible for daily building PM duties. In most cases, housekeeping surveys could be included on computer-generated work under systems so they become an integral part of the building PM schedule. Failure to perform PM activities on roofing systems may void the warranty and relieve the manufacturer from responsibility. A roofing PM program may not be the complete answer to a maintenance manager's roofing program, but it should help to reduce roof system problems and increase roof longevity.
|
|
Copyright (c) 2004, Benchmark, Inc., all rights reserved. Please report problems to webmaster@benchmark-inc.com Last updated August 2004 |