| Perspectives A Quarterly Information Source from Benchmark, Inc. Volume 22 June 1995 |
Roof System Selection - Design Parametersby Steve Nelson, RRC In the April 1995 issue, we focused on how future maintenance requirements can influence roof system selection. Our discussion continues with consideration of roof traffic as a project design parameter. Anticipating
Roof Traffic Generally, the most common areas of concentration are at points of access such as doorways, hatches and ladders. Traffic can be expected to be relatively heavy where directed through restricted passageways defined by the layout of the roof. In addition, the areas surrounding frequent destinations such as mechanical equipment or the building perimeter in the case of window washers, are often staging sites for service activity. Avoiding
Potential Damage Common
considerations are: If traffic is heavy but undirected across an open roof, general durability of the roofing membrane becomes important. In this case, built-up or modified bitumen roof systems may be preferred to single-ply systems for all around wearability and puncture resistance. In extreme cases, such as patio decks, heliports, heavy equipment runways, etc., an insulated roof membrane assembly (IRMA) may be the only choice durable enough for the long-term. In an IRMA system, the membrane can be protected from traffic impact by insulation board and pavers or a concrete topping slab. Compression damage can result from heavy traffic in concentrated areas. Flexible roof membranes, primarily single-plies, are unable to disperse weight when concentrated in a small area. Consequently, the load is carried by the underlying substrate material, usually the roof insulation board. If the compressive strength of the board is inadequate, it may be crushed. As a result, the board becomes thinner, causing fasteners to protrude into the membrane. The top facer skin may also separate from crushed insulation board. Should this occur on a fully adhered single-ply roof, the attachment of the membrane is seriously compromised, leaving the roof susceptible to wind damage. Sub-strate materials with high compressive strength, such as foam glass, or rigid walkway protection such as concrete pavers, should be considered when heavy traffic is anticipated. Flexible walkpad material may not be enough to disperse traffic loads. Flashings can become kick plates below access door thresholds, at the base of ladders and hatches, and around equipment curbs. Use of protective metal counterflashing with a long skirt to cover the flashing membrane will help prevent physical damage. Use of wood cants in lieu of fiber cants will provide more rigid support for built-up flashings. Flexible, reinforced single-ply membranes usually fare better than rigid or non-reinforced materials. On multi-story buildings requiring safety lines for such activities as window washing, sheet metal or other abrasion resistant material should be specified where line tie-offs occur to prevent "rope burns" through penetration flashings. Collateral damage to roof components that act as obstacles to traffic can be avoided by accommodating traffic flow over or around obstacles. One way to do this is to provide elevated ramps to carry walkway traffic up and over raised expansion joints and major pipelines. Fixed ladder access at roof level changes can also be specified to avoid having pipes and mechanical equipment used as climbing apparatus. When selecting roofing materials and system components, carefully consider how the roof will be used in the course of daily operations. When traffic is moderate and directed, use of protective walkway materials may be sufficient. However, when traffic is heavier or undirected, the overall durability and puncture resistance of Punctures in base flashing created by ropes the roof system becomes critical to from window washing equipment. successful performance. |