By Jeff Evans and Adam Mangold
Commercial
buildings in the United States and around the world have installed single-ply
membranes for more than 30 years. In that relatively short period of time, the
single-ply industry has changed the face of low-sloped roofing.
As the industry has matured, there have been minor bumps along the road. But
manufacturers that survive have made frequent changes to their membranes and
installation methods to meet the performance demands of maintenance and
engineering managers, as well as architects, building owners and other
roofing-system specifiers.
In an ongoing effort to lower costs and produce more sustainable membranes, and
in response to new components and compounds becoming available, roofing
manufacturers constantly tinker and innovate. This continuing innovation has
resulted in advances in roofing: lower costs, increased design flexibility, and
improved system reliability.
Against this backdrop of change, roofing consumers must continually evaluate the
products that single-ply manufacturers bring to market. Through trade
organizations, such as SPRI, roofing manufacturers and component suppliers
continually evaluate their products and offer customers the best possible
roofing components.
Market
trends
Between
1999 and 2003, Benchmark Inc. surveyed more than 250 million square feet of
roofing systems across the United States. Single-ply, or flexible membrane,
systems accounted for 39 percent of this area, followed by asphalt built-up
roofing (BUR) and modified bitumen systems, which accounted for 30 percent and
14 percent, respectively. This statistic points to the popularity achieved by
flexible membrane systems in a relatively short time.
The National Roofing Contractors Association's 2003 survey of the low-slope
market share for new construction revealed these findings:
Comparing this set
of findings to previous surveys reveals a steady increase in general in the use
of flexible membranes, whereas EPDM use appears to be leveling off. The growth
of flexible membrane systems appears greatest in thermoplastic membranes, which
include PVC, ketone ethylene ester (KEE or Elvaloy) / PVC blends, and TPO.
These trends reflect the growing popularity of flexible membrane systems,
perhaps as a result of an increased interest in white reflective roofs for their
combination of lower installed costs with optimal in-field performance.
Single-ply
developments
Cool
roofs. In response to the call for reducing the heat-island effect in major
cities and the growing popularity of sustainability initiatives such as the U.S.
Green Building Council's LEED rating system, roofing end users have become
increasingly interested in white reflective roofing systems. Roofing
manufacturers have devoted considerable research, time, effort and expense to
meet or exceed requirements for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ENERGY
STAR®
label for roofing membranes.
This focus has pushed the development of different pigments and coatings for
flexible membranes. Many membrane manufacturers already have met the initial and
three-year aged reflectivity requirements for the ENERGY
STAR®
label.
Maintenance and engineering managers should not base the choice to specify a
cool roof on the geographical, financial and climate conditions specific to a
site. To determine whether a financial benefit exists in choosing a white or
reflective roof, managers can check out the Cool
Roof Calculator - developed by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Oak
Ridge National Laboratories.
Increased system performance. Along with the research and development
focus on cool roofs, flexible membrane manufacturers have continued to improve
the physical properties of membranes. A trend in the industry is to use thicker
membranes, with the thought that thicker means better longevity, increased
puncture resistance and improved durability. Using a high-density board beneath
the membrane provides improved puncture resistance.
While EPDM membranes have been available in sheet widths up to 50 feet, the
width of thermoplastic membranes generally has been limited to about 6 feet.
With new manufacturing lines coming into production, manufacturers now can make
thermoplastic membranes in 10-foot widths.
This change can be viewed as both a benefit and concern. The increased width of
flexible membranes allows for reduced costs, due to increased production, and it
reduces the quantity of field seams.
But wider membranes might be more affected by long-term wind resistance when
these sheets are used in mechanically attached systems. Flexible membrane
manufacturers have achieved wind uplift test results in the FM 1-120 range using
wider membranes.
It is important to note that this ability to use wider membranes can be
attributed to improvements in fastener design, composite batten-bar materials,
and double-weld technology, all of which increase wind-uplift resistance.
But as wind-uplift resistance improves for flexible membrane systems, the focus
of potential wind damage shifts from loss of the roof membrane to loss of the
entire roof system. Fewer attachments can result in higher localized stresses at
the interfaces of fastener plates and membranes and at fasteners and roof decks.
Specifiers must review the yield strength of the steel deck and its attachment
to the structure to ensure the installation does not exceed the deck's
wind-uplift capacity.
Membrane repair and remediation improvements. Flexible membrane systems
have been in use long enough that managers now look for ways to extend the
service life of aging membranes. System deficiencies most often observed with
flexible membranes include membrane shrinkage, punctures, voids and sealant
deterioration.
Membrane shrinkage most often occurs in ballasted EPDM systems and most often is
exacerbated by poor perimeter attachment of the membrane. Typical corrective
actions include cutting the membrane along the perimeter flashings and
reattaching it at the perimeter.
Seam tapes and peel-and-stick flashing materials have made the repair of
punctures and seam defects more successful and less expensive. Maintenance
technicians can use these materials where they otherwise might have been
intimidated by heat welding, splice washes, adhesives and sealants.
As flexible membranes age, they tend to suffer from deterioration due to
exposure to ultraviolet rays. Attempts to coat these aging roofs have helped
extend the roofs' service lives. In response to this trend, membrane
manufacturers have developed pre-cleaning products that effectively strip off
dirt and contaminants, allowing easier membrane preparation and better adhesion
of coatings.
Membrane formulation and construction. Two U.S. companies currently
manufacture all commercially available EPDM roofing membranes. Though the
formulations of membranes to have changed little in recent years, both
manufacturers have added pressure-sensitive, or peel-and-stick, tapes and
flashing materials. EPDM membranes are available in thicknesses ranging from 45
mils to 90 mils and are available both reinforced and unreinforced.
Ten U.S. manufacturers offer PVC, PVC/ Elvaloy, and other PVC-blended membranes.
Early developmental problems with non-reinforced membranes has resulted in only
reinforced products being manufactured in the last 15 years. As time passes and
the reinforced membrane systems continue to perform, specifiers will continue to
reconsider PVC roofing.
TPO membranes have been on the market for just over 10 years. Their performance
as a group generally has been good, yet there have been instances of TPO
membrane failure and seam-welding problems. The roofing industry has had
significant discussion about the use of fire-retardant additives in formulating
TPO membranes. Without the fire retardants, TPO membranes would not be able to
pass UL fire testing.
Since TPO membranes were introduced, the fire-retardant additives have been
changed from halogenated fire retardants to magnesium oxide. Of the five TPO
manufacturers contacted, four implemented this change in 1999.
With a solid reputation for reliability and cost-effectiveness, flexible
membrane roofing systems are no longer considered new-fangled and have become a
mainstay for institutional and commercial facilities. Factors such as
cost-effectiveness, sustainability and ease of maintenance will continue to make
these systems more attractive within the institutional and commercial building
market.
Evolutionary changes in membranes, attachment methods and accessories seem
certain. Careful selection of the appropriate style of flexible membrane
systems, appropriate design, and skilled installation are essential, since the
correct decisions during the design phase will increase the likelihood of a
roof's success.